Hamilton v. Ehle
This text of 74 F. App'x 814 (Hamilton v. Ehle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[815]*815MEMORANDUM
California state prisoner George Hamilton appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim in his petition seeking a writ of mandamus. Hamilton requested that the district court order state prison officials to stop interfering with his legal mail and provide him proper access to the prison library. We conclude that the district court did not err in finding it lacked jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus to state officers. Demos v. United States Dist. Court for E. Dist. of Wash., 925 F.2d 1160, 1161 (9th Cir.1991).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 F. App'x 814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamilton-v-ehle-ca9-2003.