Hamilton v. Coons

35 Ky. 317, 5 Dana 317, 1837 Ky. LEXIS 64
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedMay 8, 1837
StatusPublished

This text of 35 Ky. 317 (Hamilton v. Coons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hamilton v. Coons, 35 Ky. 317, 5 Dana 317, 1837 Ky. LEXIS 64 (Ky. Ct. App. 1837).

Opinion

Chief Justice Robertson

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

In debt on a bond for money, the defendants pleaded payment, concluding to the country, and. the plaintiffs joined issue by adding a similiter.

On that issue the jury found a verdict for the debt, subject to a credit for a partial payment endorsed on the bond, and also for another sum, which was the assessed value of some iron said to have been received in part [318]*318payment of the bond—both of which sums were said to have been paid after the day of payment.

The plaintiffs having objected to proof of partial payment, under the issue, now ask a reversal of the judgment, principally on account of the last credit allowed by the jury, and which the Circuit Court allowed in the judgment on the verdict.

Neither partial payment after the day, nor accord and satisfaction, partial or total, is admissible under an issue as to entire payment, either on or after the day of payment. 5 Monroe, 496; 13 Johnson, 357.

And the issue, though informal, must be deemed one of payment or not. When the defendants averred payment and concluded to the country, the similiter formed a substantial issue on the fact averred—the defendants praying an enquiry as to payment, the plaintiffs joined in that prayer. But if there be any objection now to that issue, the first fault was that of the defendants.

And, therefore, as the ’ objection made to the proof was not waived by the pleadings — the judgment of the Circuit Court, especially for the last credit, was erroneous; and is therefore reversed, and the 'cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 Ky. 317, 5 Dana 317, 1837 Ky. LEXIS 64, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamilton-v-coons-kyctapp-1837.