Hamilton v. Commissioner of Social Security

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

CHRISTOPHER H., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 19-cv-1192-JES-JEH ) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ) SECURITY, ) ) Defendant. )

ORDERmm

This matter is now before the Court on a Report and Recommendation from Magistrate Judge Hawley. Doc. 17. More than 14 days have elapsed since the filing of the Report and Recommendation, and no objections have been made. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Lockert v. Faulkner, 843 F.2d 1015 (7th Cir. 1988); Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd., 797 F.2d 538, 539 (7th Cir. 1986). As the parties have not presented timely objections, any such objections have been waived. Id. Accordingly, the Court adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 17), grants Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 12), and denies Defendant’s Motion for Summary Affirmance (Doc. 15). This matter is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with Report and Recommendation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Sentence Four. IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk is directed to close the case. Signed on this 6th day of May, 2020. s/James E. Shadid _________ James E. Shadid United States District Judge