Hamilton v. City of Shreveport

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Hamilton v. City of Shreveport

168 So. 2d 824, 246 La. 917, 1964 La. LEXIS 2817

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided December 1, 1964·No. No. 47551·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In re: William B. Hamilton, Mrs. Lavada Smith Tracy, William Scott Wilkinson and Mrs. Margaret West Wilkinson applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo. 168 So.2d 380.

Writ granted but limited to the question of whether the respondent is immune from liability in view of Sec. 35 of Art. 3 of the-Constitution, as amended by Act 621 of 1960, LSA.

'SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion that the writ should*he granted without limitation. HAMITER, J., is recused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: William B. Hamilton, Mrs. Lavada Smith Tracy, William Scott Wilkinson and Mrs. Margaret West Wilkinson applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo. 168 So.2d 380.

Writ granted but limited to the question of whether the respondent is immune from liability in view of Sec. 35 of Art. 3 of the-Constitution, as amended by Act 621 of 1960, LSA.

'SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion that the writ should*he granted without limitation. HAMITER, J., is recused.

Hamilton v. City of Shreveport, 168 So. 2d 824, 246 La. 917, 1964 La. LEXIS 2817 (La. 1964).

Pincite

168 So. 2d 824 (Hamilton v. City of Shreveport) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related