Hamilton v. City of Shreveport

168 So. 2d 824, 246 La. 917, 1964 La. LEXIS 2817
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedDecember 1, 1964
DocketNo. 47551
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 168 So. 2d 824 (Hamilton v. City of Shreveport) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hamilton v. City of Shreveport, 168 So. 2d 824, 246 La. 917, 1964 La. LEXIS 2817 (La. 1964).

Opinion

In re: William B. Hamilton, Mrs. Lavada Smith Tracy, William Scott Wilkinson and Mrs. Margaret West Wilkinson applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo. 168 So.2d 380.

Writ granted but limited to the question of whether the respondent is immune from liability in view of Sec. 35 of Art. 3 of the-Constitution, as amended by Act 621 of 1960, LSA.

'SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion that the writ should*he granted without limitation. HAMITER, J., is recused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hamilton v. City of Shreveport
180 So. 2d 30 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 So. 2d 824, 246 La. 917, 1964 La. LEXIS 2817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamilton-v-city-of-shreveport-la-1964.