Hamilton v. Bullock.

Superior Court of North Carolina

Hamilton v. Bullock.

3 N.C. 224

Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided July 5, 1802·Published

Opinion

JOHNSTON, Judge.-

The plaintiff moves for & new trial, " and it is objected to him, that a new trial has been before granted ; and that there cannot be a new trial after a new trial. I am of opinion there may be, and the court ought to grant a new trial, where it is evident the second verdict is against law.

So a new trial was granted the second time. 4 Burrow, 2108, was the case cited in confirmation of the judge’s opinion,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JOHNSTON, Judge.-

The plaintiff moves for & new trial, " and it is objected to him, that a new trial has been before granted ; and that there cannot be a new trial after a new trial. I am of opinion there may be, and the court ought to grant a new trial, where it is evident the second verdict is against law.

So a new trial was granted the second time. 4 Burrow, 2108, was the case cited in confirmation of the judge’s opinion,

Hamilton v. Bullock., 3 N.C. 224 (N.C. Ct. App. 1802).

Pincite

3 N.C. 224 (Hamilton v. Bullock.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.