Hamilton v. Boston Port & Seamen's Aid Society
126 Mass. 407, 1879 Mass. LEXIS 279
Opinion
The judge by whom the case was tried had the same power as a jury, and, upon the particular facts stated in the auditor’s report and the additional evidence, was not required, as matter of law, to reach the same general conclusion as the auditor, but was warranted in finding that the plaintiff never in fact lent the money sought to be recovered in this action. Blackington v. Johnson, ante, 21.
Judgment for the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hamilton v. Boston Port & Seamen's Aid Society, 126 Mass. 407, 1879 Mass. LEXIS 279 (Mass. 1879).
126 Mass. 407 (Hamilton v. Boston Port & Seamen's Aid Society) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cunningham v. Brackett
62 N.E. 250 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1902)
Livingston v. Hammond
38 N.E. 968 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1894)
Emerson v. Patch
129 Mass. 299 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1880)