Hamilton v. Baum

6 A. 222, 3 Sadler 150
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 4, 1886·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The evidence was sufficient to carry this case to the jury. It was submitted, in a clear and correct charge. The law was correctly declared. There was more than a scintilla of evidence to justify the verdict. The presumption arising from clearly established facts was not rebutted by any evidence whatever.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton v. Baum, 6 A. 222, 3 Sadler 150 (Pa. 1886).

6 A. 222 (Hamilton v. Baum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kimbro & Therict v. Warmoth
2 Pelt. 314 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1919)
Golding v. Steamer America
20 La. 455 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1868)