Hamilton v. Baum
6 A. 222, 3 Sadler 150
This text of 6 A. 222 (Hamilton v. Baum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hamilton v. Baum, 6 A. 222, 3 Sadler 150 (Pa. 1886).
Opinion
The evidence was sufficient to carry this case to the jury. It was submitted, in a clear and correct charge. The law was correctly declared. There was more than a scintilla of evidence to justify the verdict. The presumption arising from clearly established facts was not rebutted by any evidence whatever.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kimbro & Therict v. Warmoth
2 Pelt. 314 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1919)
Golding v. Steamer America
20 La. 455 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1868)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
6 A. 222, 3 Sadler 150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamilton-v-baum-pa-1886.