Hamilton v. BANK ONE NAT. ASS'N
711 N.W.2d 81, 474 Mich. 1099
Opinion
F. Timberlane HAMILTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BANK ONE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Homecomings Financial, Hess Hess & Hess, Trott & Trott, TCIF, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the March 14, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hamilton v. BANK ONE NAT. ASS'N, 711 N.W.2d 81, 474 Mich. 1099 (Mich. 2006).
711 N.W.2d 81 (Hamilton v. BANK ONE NAT. ASS'N) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.