Hamilton v. Attorney Grievance
774 N.W.2d 864, 485 Mich. 980
Opinion
Frederick HAMILTON, Plaintiff,
v.
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE Commission, Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hamilton v. Attorney Grievance, 774 N.W.2d 864, 485 Mich. 980 (Mich. 2009).
774 N.W.2d 864 (Hamilton v. Attorney Grievance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.