Hamilton v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.

18 S.E.2d 367, 220 N.C. 815, 1942 N.C. LEXIS 553
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 23, 1942·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an action brought by the plaintiff, a resident of the State of New York, against the defendant, a Virginia corporation, *816 doing business in this State, to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through the negligence of the defendant occurring in the State of Virginia. Service of process was made upon the process agent appointed by the defendant under C. S., 1137.

The majority of the Court are of the opinion that the court below acquired no jurisdiction of the defendant under such service; King v. Motor Lines, 219 N. C., 223, 13 S. E. (2d), 233; and that the question is properly raised on defendant’s objection to the jurisdiction. The action must therefore be dismissed. It is not deemed necessary to decide the other questions involved.

Judgment of the court below is

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp., 18 S.E.2d 367, 220 N.C. 815, 1942 N.C. LEXIS 553 (N.C. 1942).

18 S.E.2d 367 (Hamilton v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. J. B. Hunt & Sons, Inc.
133 S.E.2d 644 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)
Motor Lines v. . Transportation Co.
36 S.E.2d 271 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1945)
Central Motor Lines, Inc. v. Brooks Transportation Co.
225 N.C. 733 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1945)