Hamilton v. Amsden

88 Ind. 304
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1882·No. No. 9566·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Elliott, J.

— The treasurer of Shelby county charged against the appellant taxes for years prior to 1879, threatened to collect them, and the latter instituted this action to enjoin him.

The controlling question in this case is settled by the decisions in State, ex rel., v. Howard, 80 Ind. 466, and Vogel v. Vogler, 78 Ind. 353. A treasurer has no authority to make assessments of omitted property except for the current year.

Assessments' must be made by the officers designated by law, and an assessment made by an unauthorized person can hot be enforced. The treasurer is authorized to make special assessments only in particular cases and within a limited time, and if he undertakes to make them in other cases or at other times than those prescribed, his acts are void. No authority is conferred upon the treasurer to revise the valuation of property made by the proper officers, and assessments made by him in attempting to exercise such revisory power are not enforceable.

Judgment reversed. .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton v. Amsden, 88 Ind. 304 (Ind. 1882).

88 Ind. 304 (Hamilton v. Amsden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fesler v. Bosson
128 N.E. 145 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1920)
Parkinson v. Jasper County Telephone Co.
67 N.E. 471 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1903)
City of Hannibal ex rel. Bassen v. Bowman
71 S.W. 1122 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1903)
State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Holliday
42 L.R.A. 826 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1898)
McKeen v. Haskell
8 N.E. 901 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1886)
Lang v. Clapp
2 N.E. 197 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1885)
Bishop v. Moorman
98 Ind. 1 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1884)