Hamilton v. Amsden
This text of 88 Ind. 304 (Hamilton v. Amsden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— The treasurer of Shelby county charged against the appellant taxes for years prior to 1879, threatened to collect them, and the latter instituted this action to enjoin him.
The controlling question in this case is settled by the decisions in State, ex rel., v. Howard, 80 Ind. 466, and Vogel v. Vogler, 78 Ind. 353. A treasurer has no authority to make assessments of omitted property except for the current year.
Assessments' must be made by the officers designated by law, and an assessment made by an unauthorized person can hot be enforced. The treasurer is authorized to make special assessments only in particular cases and within a limited time, and if he undertakes to make them in other cases or at other times than those prescribed, his acts are void. No authority is conferred upon the treasurer to revise the valuation of property made by the proper officers, and assessments made by him in attempting to exercise such revisory power are not enforceable.
Judgment reversed. .
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
88 Ind. 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamilton-v-amsden-ind-1882.