Hamilton v. American Nat. Ins. Co.

200 S.W. 259, 1918 Tex. App. LEXIS 21
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 16, 1918
DocketNo. 5947.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 200 S.W. 259 (Hamilton v. American Nat. Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hamilton v. American Nat. Ins. Co., 200 S.W. 259, 1918 Tex. App. LEXIS 21 (Tex. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

MOURSUND, J.

This is an appeal from an order made June 28, 1917, refusing to vacate a receivership, and refusing to dissolve a temporary injunction.

[1] There is no appeal permitted by law from an order refusing to dissolve an injunction, but the last Legislature passed an act allowing appeals from interlocutory orders refusing to vacate receiverships. General Laws 1917, Reg. Sess. c. 168.

[2] The case is therefore before us solely on the question of the appointment of a rei ceiver. No briefs have been filed. There is no statute dispensing with briefs in cases of this kind.

The appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ellman v. Reinarz
384 S.W.2d 437 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 S.W. 259, 1918 Tex. App. LEXIS 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamilton-v-american-nat-ins-co-texapp-1918.