Hamilton v. Alumax Extrusions, Inc.

724 So. 2d 195, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 611, 1999 WL 28735
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 27, 1999·No. No. 97-4639·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The JCC’s order dismissing the claim contains no finding of Claimant’s wilful noncompliance with a previous order, which compelled his attendance at independent medical examinations. Failure to include specific written findings of fact of wilfulness in the order of dismissal constitutes reversible error. Townsend v. Feinberg, 659 So.2d 1218, 1219 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) (citing Commonwealth Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Tubero, 569 So.2d 1271 (Fla.1990); In re the Forfeiture of Twenty Thousand Nine Hundred Dollars ($20,900) U.S. Currency, 539 So.2d 14 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the JCC to make the requisite written findings, provided they are supported by the record.

BOOTH, VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton v. Alumax Extrusions, Inc., 724 So. 2d 195, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 611, 1999 WL 28735 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

724 So. 2d 195 (Hamilton v. Alumax Extrusions, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Forfeiture $20,900 US Currency
539 So. 2d 14 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Commonwealth Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Tubero
569 So. 2d 1271 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Townsend v. Feinberg
659 So. 2d 1218 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)