Hamilton Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner
This text of 6 T.C.M. 1269 (Hamilton Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum Opinion
HARLAN, Judge: The respondent determined a deficiency of $1,143.32 in Federal excess profits tax due from this petitioner for the taxable year 1943.
The sole question presented is whether petitioner, on the accrual basis, may, in computing equity invested capital, include in accumulated earnings and profits as of the beginning of the calendar year 1943, the post-war refund credit provided by
We adopt the stipulation filed herein as our findings of fact.
[The Facts]
The petitioner is a corporation organized and existing by virtue of the laws of the State of Minnesota with its principal office at 413 South Fifth Street, Minneapolis, *23 Minnesota. Petitioner's income and excess profits tax returns for the year ended December 31, 1943, were filed with the collector of internal revenue, St. Paul, Minnesota. Petitioner keeps its books and renders its income and excess profits tax returns on the basis of the accrual method of accounting based on invested capital and did so during each of the calendar years 1942 and 1943.
In its excess profits tax return for the taxable year ended December 31, 1942, petitioner disclosed an excess profits tax in the amount of $117,932.91. This tax was duly paid during the calendar year 1943 and a post-war refund as to such payment has been allowed of $11,793.29 pursuant to
In computing petitioner's equity invested capital in the notice of deficiency, post-war refunds of excess profits tax in the amounts of $11,793.29 and $3,548.91 were not included in accumulated earnings and profits as of the beginning of the taxable year ended December 31, 1943.
[Opinion]
In Altschul's, Inc.,
While we think the above decision is controlling of the issue presented in this proceeding, respondent on brief indicates that he is of the opinion that different treatment should be accorded the post-war refund credit resulting from his determination*25 in November, 1945, of a deficiency in petitioner's excess profits tax for the year 1942, in the amount of $35,489.06, and the subsequent payment of this deficiency on November 29, 1945. The credit for post-war refund of $3,548.91 was used at that time to satisfy a part of the deficiency.
Section 3 (f) of the Tax Adjustment Act of 1945, enacted July 31, 1945, amended
Respondent urges that to ask this Court to hold that the post-war credit of $3,548.91 was an asset in 1942 prior to its very existence so far as this petitioner is concerned, is to ask us to enlarge the scope of the provisions of
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 T.C.M. 1269, 1947 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamilton-mfg-co-v-commissioner-tax-1947.