Hamilton, Jim Herbert Jr.
This text of Hamilton, Jim Herbert Jr. (Hamilton, Jim Herbert Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-29,351-12
EX PARTE JIM HERBERT HAMILTON, JR., Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 876248-A IN THE 262ND DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of aggravated sexual assault and sentenced to life imprisonment.
The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Hamilton v. State, No. 14-02-00072-CR
(Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Aug. 19, 2003) (not designated for publication). Applicant filed
this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk
forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends that he is actually innocent, the State presented false evidence and failed
to disclose exculpatory evidence, and trial and appellate counsel were ineffective. Applicant has
alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Ex parte Elizondo, 947 S.W.2d 202 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1996); Ex parte Weinstein, 421 S.W.3d 656 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); Brady v. Maryland, 373 2
U.S. 83 (1963); Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). The trial court entered a timely
order designating issues but recommended that we dismiss this application because Applicant’s
memorandum of law exceeded fifty pages. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.1(d). After the trial court made
this recommendation, Applicant requested that his memorandum of law be struck. Accordingly, we
believe that this application now complies with Rule 73.1(d). We remand this application to the trial
court to complete its evidentiary investigation, as set out in its order designating issues, and to make
findings of fact and conclusions of law.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: February 24, 2021 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hamilton, Jim Herbert Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamilton-jim-herbert-jr-texcrimapp-2021.