Hamilton Foods, Inc. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

Ninth Circuit

Hamilton Foods, Inc. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

173 F.2d 573

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 11, 1949·No. No. 11961·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM. .

This case was tried to the judge without the aid of a jury and, upon a thorough review of the evidence, we find substantial evidence to support the findings and we cannot say that there is clear error in the case. Rule 52.(a), Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. The judgment as to the appeal in Hamilton Foods, Inc., v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, and Jack Belyea etc., and the judgment as to the cross-appeal in Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company v. Hamilton Foods, Inc., 83 F.Supp. 478, are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM. .

This case was tried to the judge without the aid of a jury and, upon a thorough review of the evidence, we find substantial evidence to support the findings and we cannot say that there is clear error in the case. Rule 52.(a), Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. The judgment as to the appeal in Hamilton Foods, Inc., v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, and Jack Belyea etc., and the judgment as to the cross-appeal in Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company v. Hamilton Foods, Inc., 83 F.Supp. 478, are affirmed.

Hamilton Foods, Inc. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co., 173 F.2d 573 (9th Cir. 1949).

Pincite

173 F.2d 573 (Hamilton Foods, Inc. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related