Hamilton Foods, Inc. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

173 F.2d 573
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 11, 1949
DocketNo. 11961
StatusPublished

This text of 173 F.2d 573 (Hamilton Foods, Inc. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hamilton Foods, Inc. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co., 173 F.2d 573 (9th Cir. 1949).

Opinion

PER CURIAM. .

This case was tried to the judge without the aid of a jury and, upon a thorough review of the evidence, we find substantial evidence to support the findings and we cannot say that there is clear error in the case. Rule 52.(a), Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. The judgment as to the appeal in Hamilton Foods, Inc., v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, and Jack Belyea etc., and the judgment as to the cross-appeal in Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company v. Hamilton Foods, Inc., 83 F.Supp. 478, are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
173 F.2d 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamilton-foods-inc-v-atchison-topeka-santa-fe-railway-co-ca9-1949.