Hamilton Equity Group, LLC v. Nice Food, Inc.
This text of 2026 NY Slip Op 30993(U) (Hamilton Equity Group, LLC v. Nice Food, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Hamilton Equity Group, LLC v Nice Food, Inc. 2026 NY Slip Op 30993(U) March 16, 2026 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 160631/2024 Judge: Emily Morales-Minerva Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication.
file:///LRB-ALB-FS1/Vol1/ecourts/Process/covers/NYSUP.1606312024.NEW_YORK.001.LBLX000_TO.html[03/24/2026 3:45:45 PM] FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/17/2026 11:58 AM INDEX NO. 160631/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 16 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/16/2026
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: PART 42M --------------------------X
HAMILTON EQUITY GROUP, LLC,AS ASSIGNEE OF INDEX NO. 160631 /2024 HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
Plaintiff, MOTION DATE 07/21/2025
- V - MOTION SEQ. NO. 001 NICE FOOD, INC.,ZAFAR IQBAL
Defendants. DECISION+ ORDER ON MOTION
,--------------------------------X
The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 were read on this motion to/for RENEWAL APPEARANCES:
Rupp Pfalzgraf LLC, Buffalo, NY (Kyle C. Didone, Esq., of counsel), for plaintiff.
EMILY MORALES-MINERVA, J.S.C.
In this action seeking to renew the August 29, 2006
judgment issued in favor of non-party HSBC Bank USA, National
Association against defendants NICE FOOD and ZAFAR IQBAL in the
amount of $103,958.97, plaintiff HAMILTON EQUITY GROUP, LLC, as
assignee of HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCATION, moves, pursuant
to CPLR § 3215, for an order granting it a renewal judgment
against defendants in the amount of $103,958.97, together with
statutory interest from September 05, 2005.
An action for a renewal judgment can constitute one for a
sum certain, and therefore, defaults in a CPLR § 5014 proceeding 160631/2024 HAMILTON EQUITY GROUP, LLC, AS ASSIGNEE OF HSBC BANK USA, Page 1 of4 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION vs. NICE FOOD, INC. ET AL Motion No. 001
[* 1] 1 of 4 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/17/2026 11:58 AM INDEX NO. 160631/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 16 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/16/2026
are subject to the applications and procedures governed by
CPLR § 3215 (see Capital Equity Mgt., LLC v Sunshine, 222 AD3d
640, 642 [2d Dept 2023]). Therefore, a plaintiff seeking a
renewal judgment based on a defendants' default must satisfy the
statutory requirements, including those governing proof of
service and proof of the facts constituting a claim, on a
CPLR § 3215 motion (see id.).
To establish entitlement to a default judgment, plaintiff
must file (1) proof it served defendant with the summons and
complaint, and (2) "proof of the facts constituting the claim,
the default, and the amount due . . . by affidavit made by the
party" (see CPLR § 3215 [f]; see also Woodson v Mendon Leasing
Corp., 100 NY2d 62, 70 [2003] [providing that "an applicant for
a default judgment [must] file 'proof by affidavit made by the
party of the facts constituting the claim'"]; 231st Riverdale
LLC v 7 Star Home Furniture Inc., 198 AD3d 524, 525 [1st Dept
2021]; Feffer v Malpeso, 210 AD2d 60 [1st Dept 1994]).
In order for a plaintiff to establish its prima facie
entitlement to a renewal judgment, plaintiff must show (1) the
existence of the underlying judgment; (2) that the defendant was
a judgment debtor; (3) that the underlying judgment was docketed
at least nine years prior to the commencement of this action;
and (4) that the underlying judgment remained partially or
completely unsatisfied (see CPLR § 5014; Lull v Van Tassell, 171 160631/2024 HAMILTON EQUITY GROUP, LLC, AS ASSIGNEE OF HSBC BANK USA, Page 2 of 4 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION vs. NICE FOOD, INC. ET AL Motion No. 001
[* 2] 2 of 4 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/17/2026 11:58 AM INDEX NO. 160631/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 16 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/16/2026
AD3d 1155, 1156 [2d Dept 2019]; see also The Cadle Co. v
Biberaj, 307 AD2d 889 [1st Dept 2003]).
Here, plaintiff has not established its entitlement to
entry of a default judgment against defendants pursuant to CPLR
§ 3215. Plaintiff submits sufficient proof of service of the
summons and complaint (New York State Court Electronic Filing
System [NYSCEF] Doc. Nos. 04 and 05} and defendants' default
(NYSCEF Doc. No. 07}, but has failed to submit "proof by
affidavit made by the party of the facts constituting the claim"
(231st Riverdale LLC v 7 Star Home Furniture Inc., 198 AD3d 524,
525 [1st Dept 2021]}.
Specifically, though plaintiff submits the underlying
judgment entered on August 29, 2026 (NYSCEF Doc. No. 02,
underlying judgment issued in HSBC Bank USA, National
Association v Nice Food and Zafar Iqbal, Index No. 601950/2006}
as well as the assignment of judgment to plaintiff HAMILTON
EQUITY GROUP, LLC (NYSCEF Doc. No. 03, assignment of judgment,
dated June 09, 2009), the affirmation of Kyle C. DiDone, Esq.,
counsel for plaintiff, is insufficient to demonstrate that the
underlying judgment remains partially or completely unsatisfied
(see Perlberger v Lutin, 202 AD3d 554, 555 [1st Dept 2022]
[finding that plaintiff met his prima facie burden on his motion
for summary judgment in lieu of complaint seeking to renew a
money judgment by submitting, among other things, "his personal 160631/2024 HAMILTON EQUITY GROUP, LLC, AS ASSIGNEE OF HSBC BANK USA, Page 3 of 4 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION vs. NICE FOOD, INC. ET AL Motion No. 001
[* 3] 3 of 4 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/17/2026 11:58 AM INDEX NO. 160631/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 16 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/16/2026
affidavit stat[ing] that the underlying judgment remains wholly
unsatisfied"] [emphasis added] )
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that plaintiff's motion (seq. no. 001), pursuant to
CPLR § 3215, for a default judgment, is dismissed without
prejudice; it is further
ORDERED that, within fifteen days from the date of this
decision and order, plaintiff shall serve a copy of this order,
with notice of entry, upon defendants; it is further
ORDERED that plaintiff shall bring a renewed default
judgment motion within 90 days from the date of this decision
and order; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mark the file
accordingly.
3/16/2026 DATE
~ CHECK ONE: CASE DISPOSED NON-FINAL POSITION
GRANTED 0 DENIED GRANTED IN PART □ OTHER APPLICATION: SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER
CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT □ REFERENCE
160631/2024 HAMILTON EQUITY GROUP, LLC, AS ASSIGNEE OF HSBC BANK USA, Page4of4 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION vs. NICE FOOD, INC. ET AL Motion No. 001
[* 4] 4 of 4
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2026 NY Slip Op 30993(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamilton-equity-group-llc-v-nice-food-inc-nysupctnewyork-2026.