Hamilton County v. Raben

Nebraska Supreme Court

Hamilton County v. Raben

23 Neb. 723

DecidedJanuary 15, 1888

StatusPublished

This text of 23 Neb. 723 (Hamilton County v. Raben) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hamilton County v. Raben, 23 Neb. 723 (Neb. 1888).

Pincite

Opinion

Eeese, Ch. J.

This action was against Hamilton county upon an account for medicine furnished one J. M. Immel, a nonresident, who became sick in Aurora, and was without means to procure the same. In all other respects the case is similar to Hamilton County v. T. L. Meyers, ante p. 718. The decision in that case is decisive of this.

The judgment of the district court is reversed, the demurrer overruled, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

Eeversed and remanded;

The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eeese, Ch. J.

This action was against Hamilton county upon an account for medicine furnished one J. M. Immel, a nonresident, who became sick in Aurora, and was without means to procure the same. In all other respects the case is similar to Hamilton County v. T. L. Meyers, ante p. 718. The decision in that case is decisive of this.

The judgment of the district court is reversed, the demurrer overruled, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

Eeversed and remanded;

The other judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 Neb. 723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamilton-county-v-raben-neb-1888.