Hamilton Brown Shoe Co. v. Williams

91 Mo. App. 511, 1902 Mo. App. LEXIS 303
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 20, 1902·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ELLISON, J.

— The abstract here presented does not show any record entry of the filing of the bill of exceptions or of granting time within which such bill might be filed. The hill of exceptions shows these things, but the bill of exceptions is not a place in which to enter the record proper. The bill itself only becomes a record by a record entry of [512] its filing. The appeal is dismissed. Western Storage Co. v. Glasner, 150 Mo. 426; Butler Co. v. Graddy, 152 Mo. 443; Burdick v. Security Life, 86 Mo. App. 94.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton Brown Shoe Co. v. Williams, 91 Mo. App. 511, 1902 Mo. App. LEXIS 303 (Mo. Ct. App. 1902).

91 Mo. App. 511 (Hamilton Brown Shoe Co. v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mulloy v. Clark
109 S.W. 801 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1908)