Hamill v. O'Donnell

2 Miles 101
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County·Decided May 27, 1837·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The act of 28th March, 1835, sect. 2d., in using the words, “ book debt” and “ book entries,” refers to their usual signification, which includes goods sold and delivered, and work, labour and services performed, the evidence of which, on the part of the plaintiff, consists of entries in an original book, such as is competent to go to a jury, were the issue trying before them-The words of a statute, are in construction, to receive their ordinary and usual meaning, and no strained inference is to be drawn; this is a familiar rule. The judgment in this case must be set aside.

Rule absolute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamill v. O'Donnell, 2 Miles 101 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1837).

2 Miles 101 (Hamill v. O'Donnell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wachter's Case
1 Walk. 267 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1879)
Wall v. Dovey
60 Pa. 212 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1869)