Hamill v. New York State Gas & Electric Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hamill v. New York State Gas & Electric Co.

1 A.D.2d 1020, 151 N.Y.S.2d 442, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5398

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 14, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 1 A.D.2d 1020 (Hamill v. New York State Gas & Electric Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hamill v. New York State Gas & Electric Co., 1 A.D.2d 1020, 151 N.Y.S.2d 442, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5398 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendants appeal from an order dated January 17, 1956, granting plaintiff’s motion for a preference and from an order dated February 9, 1956, denying their motion for a change of the place of trial from Kings County to Tompkins County. Order dated January 17, 1956, reversed, without costs, and motion denied. There was no sufficient showing of destitution or indigence to warrant the exercise of discretion in favor of granting the preference. (See Farewell v. Milbank, 284 App. Div. 898, and cases there cited.) Order dated February 9, 1956, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hghetta and Hallinan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendants appeal from an order dated January 17, 1956, granting plaintiff’s motion for a preference and from an order dated February 9, 1956, denying their motion for a change of the place of trial from Kings County to Tompkins County. Order dated January 17, 1956, reversed, without costs, and motion denied. There was no sufficient showing of destitution or indigence to warrant the exercise of discretion in favor of granting the preference. (See Farewell v. Milbank, 284 App. Div. 898, and cases there cited.) Order dated February 9, 1956, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hghetta and Hallinan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A.D.2d 1020, 151 N.Y.S.2d 442, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamill-v-new-york-state-gas-electric-co-nyappdiv-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack