Hamill v. Interurban St. Ry. Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Hamill v. Interurban St. Ry. Co.

103 N.Y.S. 1127

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedApril 10, 1907

StatusPublished

This text of 103 N.Y.S. 1127 (Hamill v. Interurban St. Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hamill v. Interurban St. Ry. Co., 103 N.Y.S. 1127 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

GIEGERICH, J.

This ause was marked off the City Court day calendar by consent on April 6, 1907 but the plaintiff’s counsel did not move to have it restored to the day calendar until January, 1907. As the affidavit did not state any reason for the delay, the motion was denied. While such disposition of the motion was warranted, I think, in view of the fact that the absoiute denial of the motion has the effect of depriTing the plaintiff of his right of trial, leave to renew should have been given on additional papers showing reason for the delay in attemptfng to move thl case for trial. The order should therefore be modified, as indicated, without costs- A11 concur-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GIEGERICH, J.

This ause was marked off the City Court day calendar by consent on April 6, 1907 but the plaintiff’s counsel did not move to have it restored to the day calendar until January, 1907. As the affidavit did not state any reason for the delay, the motion was denied. While such disposition of the motion was warranted, I think, in view of the fact that the absoiute denial of the motion has the effect of depriTing the plaintiff of his right of trial, leave to renew should have been given on additional papers showing reason for the delay in attemptfng to move thl case for trial. The order should therefore be modified, as indicated, without costs- A11 concur-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 N.Y.S. 1127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamill-v-interurban-st-ry-co-nyappterm-1907.