Hamill v. Hamill
Opinion
| Hamill v Hamill |
| 2023 NY Slip Op 04081 |
| Decided on July 28, 2023 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on July 28, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., LINDLEY, CURRAN, OGDEN, AND GREENWOOD, JJ.
585 CA 23-00576
v
PHYLLIS HAMILL AND TRACEY DIEHL, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
HAGERTY & BRADY, BUFFALO (DANIEL JOSEPH BRADY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
RUPP PFALZGRAF LLC, BUFFALO (JAMES GRABER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Dennis E. Ward, J.), entered November 29, 2022. The order, inter alia, denied a motion to dismiss the complaint and for sanctions.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Hamill v Hamill ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [July 28, 2023] [4th Dept 2023]).
Entered: July 28, 2023
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2023 NY Slip Op 04081 (Hamill v. Hamill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.