Hamilburgh v. Shepard

119 Mass. 30, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 55
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 21, 1875·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

The writ upon which the plaintiff was arrested being in due form and issued from a court of competent jurisdiction, and the arrest having been made by the officer within the scope of the authority thereby conferred upon him, the plaintiff’s cause of action, however stated in his declaration, is in substance and legal effect for malicious prosecution, and cannot be sustained without proof that the prosecution had been determined, which it had not been when this action was commenced. Cardival v. Smith, 109 Mass. 158. O'Brien v. Barry, 106 Mass. 300.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilburgh v. Shepard, 119 Mass. 30, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 55 (Mass. 1875).

119 Mass. 30 (Hamilburgh v. Shepard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Untitled Case
N.D. Indiana, 2026
Dangel v. Offset Printing, Inc.
172 N.E.2d 610 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1961)
Emery v. Ginnan
24 Ill. App. 65 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1887)
Wood v. Graves
11 N.E. 567 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1887)