Hamidovic v. State

566 S.W.3d 268
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 29, 2019
DocketWD 81173
StatusPublished

This text of 566 S.W.3d 268 (Hamidovic v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hamidovic v. State, 566 S.W.3d 268 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Mirsad Hamidovic pleaded guilty to one count of murder in the second degree in the Circuit Court of Jackson County. Hamidovic later filed a timely Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief arguing that his guilty plea was unknowing and involuntary because it failed to establish factually specific conduct for each element *269of the charged crime. The Circuit Court denied Hamidovic's motion following an evidentiary hearing. Hamidovic appeals from that judgment. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
566 S.W.3d 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamidovic-v-state-moctapp-2019.