Hamid Javadi v. Loretta E. Lynch

611 F. App'x 463
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedAugust 4, 2015
Docket12-73931
StatusUnpublished

This text of 611 F. App'x 463 (Hamid Javadi v. Loretta E. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hamid Javadi v. Loretta E. Lynch, 611 F. App'x 463 (9th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Hamid Javadi and Mojgan Fooroughi, natives of Iran and citizens of Iran and Germany, and Armin Javadi and Zara Eileen Javadi, natives and citizens of Germany, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings and reissue its previous decision. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision to decline to exercise its discretionary authority pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) to reopen and reissue its December 2011 decision. See Mejia-Hernandez v. Holder, 633 F.3d 818, 823-24 (9th Cir.2011).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mejia-Hernandez v. Holder
633 F.3d 818 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
611 F. App'x 463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamid-javadi-v-loretta-e-lynch-ca9-2015.