Hames v. Sturdivant
182 S.E. 600, 181 Ga. 472, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 127
Opinion
Tlie evidence being conflicting in the hearing on the writ of habeas corpus, the court did not err in remanding the petitioner to the proper custody. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hames v. Sturdivant, 182 S.E. 600, 181 Ga. 472, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 127 (Ga. 1935).
182 S.E. 600 (Hames v. Sturdivant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. J.M.W.
936 So. 2d 555 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2005)
In Re State v. J.M.W.
936 So. 2d 555 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2005)
State Ex Rel. Walker v. Giardina
294 S.E.2d 900 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1982)
House v. Grimes
105 S.E.2d 745 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1958)
Allen v. Wild
86 N.W.2d 839 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1957)
Hodges v. BALKCOM, Warden
76 S.E.2d 798 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1953)
Ex parte Grabel
248 S.W.2d 343 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1952)
Campbell v. Murray
23 N.W.2d 698 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1946)
Whittle v. Jones
32 S.E.2d 94 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Hart v. Mount
26 S.E.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)
Johnson v. Aldredge
14 S.E.2d 757 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)