Hames v. State
113 Ala. 674
Opinion
The appellant, Andrew Hames, was indicted and tried for murder, was convicted of murder in the second degree, and sentenced to the penitentiary for ten years.
The judgment of conviction is reversed, because it is not shown affirmatively by the record that the defendant was present personally in court when the. order setting the day for his trial was made, and when the jurors for his trial were drawn.-Spicer v. The Slate, 69 Ala. 159; Sylvester v. The State, 71 Ala. 17.
Opinion
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hames v. State, 113 Ala. 674 (Ala. 1896).
113 Ala. 674 (Hames v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hurd v. State
116 Ala. 440 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1897)
Frazier v. State
116 Ala. 442 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1897)
Stoball v. State
116 Ala. 454 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1897)