Hames v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Hames v. State

113 Ala. 674

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedNovember 15, 1896

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 113 Ala. 674 (Hames v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hames v. State, 113 Ala. 674 (Ala. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

The appellant, Andrew Hames, was indicted and tried for murder, was convicted of murder in the second degree, and sentenced to the penitentiary for ten years.

The judgment of conviction is reversed, because it is not shown affirmatively by the record that the defendant was present personally in court when the. order setting the day for his trial was made, and when the jurors for his trial were drawn.-Spicer v. The Slate, 69 Ala. 159; Sylvester v. The State, 71 Ala. 17.

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The appellant, Andrew Hames, was indicted and tried for murder, was convicted of murder in the second degree, and sentenced to the penitentiary for ten years.

The judgment of conviction is reversed, because it is not shown affirmatively by the record that the defendant was present personally in court when the. order setting the day for his trial was made, and when the jurors for his trial were drawn.-Spicer v. The Slate, 69 Ala. 159; Sylvester v. The State, 71 Ala. 17.

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 Ala. 674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hames-v-state-ala-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack