Hamersly v. Brown
2 Johns. Ch. 428, 1817 N.Y. LEXIS 208, 1817 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 11
This text of 2 Johns. Ch. 428 (Hamersly v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hamersly v. Brown, 2 Johns. Ch. 428, 1817 N.Y. LEXIS 208, 1817 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 11 (N.Y. 1817).
Opinion
[ * 429 ]
denied the motion, for want of notice to the plaintiff’s solicitor. Such a rule, after publication *has already passed, is not to be granted without due notice to the opposite party; for it is not a rule of course, and must be founded on special circumstances.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Anonymous
35 Ala. 226 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1859)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Johns. Ch. 428, 1817 N.Y. LEXIS 208, 1817 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamersly-v-brown-nychanct-1817.