Hamer v. Village of Whitesboro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hamer v. Village of Whitesboro

262 A.D. 802, 28 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5915

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 7, 1941·Published

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crosby, P. J., and Taylor, J., who dissent and vote for reversal and for dismissal of the complaint. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action for damages arising out of the negligent maintenance of street and car tracks. The order denies defendants’ motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crosby, P. J., and Taylor, J., who dissent and vote for reversal and for dismissal of the complaint. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action for damages arising out of the negligent maintenance of street and car tracks. The order denies defendants’ motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Hamer v. Village of Whitesboro, 262 A.D. 802, 28 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5915 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

262 A.D. 802 (Hamer v. Village of Whitesboro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.