Hamer v. Village of Whitesboro

262 A.D. 802, 28 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5915

This text of 262 A.D. 802 (Hamer v. Village of Whitesboro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hamer v. Village of Whitesboro, 262 A.D. 802, 28 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5915 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crosby, P. J., and Taylor, J., who dissent and vote for reversal and for dismissal of the complaint. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action for damages arising out of the negligent maintenance of street and car tracks. The order denies defendants’ motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 A.D. 802, 28 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamer-v-village-of-whitesboro-nyappdiv-1941.