Hamer v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hamer v. State

527 S.W.3d 91, 2017 WL 3479654, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 784

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 15, 2017·No. WD 79690·Published

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam:

Ms. Amy Hamer appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Platte County denying her Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Ms. Hamer’s motion argued that her trial counsel was ineffective for failing to advise her that if she did not accept a plea agreement offered by the State, the State would file an amended information charging her as a prior and persistent offender, thereby exposing her to an increased maximum prison sentence of fifteen years. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum of law has [92] been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam:

Ms. Amy Hamer appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Platte County denying her Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Ms. Hamer’s motion argued that her trial counsel was ineffective for failing to advise her that if she did not accept a plea agreement offered by the State, the State would file an amended information charging her as a prior and persistent offender, thereby exposing her to an increased maximum prison sentence of fifteen years. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum of law has [92] been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Hamer v. State, 527 S.W.3d 91, 2017 WL 3479654, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 784 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

527 S.W.3d 91 (Hamer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.