Hamer v. Griffs

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

SHADNEY HAMER, Case No. 22-12106 Plaintiff, F. Kay Behm V. United States District Judge CAROL GRIFFS, et al., Kimberly G. Altman United States Magistrate Judge Defendants. a OPINION AND ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S APRIL 28, 2023 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 68) Currently before the Court is Magistrate Judge Kimberly G. Altman’s April 28, 2023 Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 68). Judge Altman recommends

granting Defendant Herro’s motion to dismiss or for summary judgment. (ECF Nos. 68, 35). The court is fully advised in the premises and has reviewed the

record and the pleadings. Neither party has filed objections within the time

allowed. “[T]he failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report[] releases the

Court from its duty to independently review the matter.” Hall v. Rawal, 2012 WL

3639070 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 24, 2012) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149

(1985)). The court nevertheless agrees with Judge Altman’s recommended

disposition. Therefore, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s

Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 68), GRANTS Defendant Herro’s motion to

dismiss or for summary judgment (ECF No. 35), and DISMISSES Defendant Herro

with prejudice. SO ORDERED.

Date: May 22, 2023 s/F. Kay Behm F. Kay Behm United States District Judge