Hamel v. Young Spring & Wire Corp.

183 S.E.2d 687, 279 N.C. 511, 1971 N.C. LEXIS 868
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 5, 1971·Published

Opinion

183 S.E.2d 687 (1971)
279 N.C. 511

Reginald S. HAMEL, Ancillary Administrator of the Estate of William Thomas McDowell, Jr.
v.
YOUNG SPRING & WIRE CORP. et al.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 5, 1971.

Claude R. Dunbar, Hunter M. Jones, for plaintiff.

John H. Small, R. C. Carmichael, Jr., for defendants Young Spring & Wire Corp., Paul Handeman, Inc., and Daybrook-Ottawa Corp.

Carpenter, Golding, Crews & Meekins, Michael K. Gordon, for defendant Twin-States Truck Equipment Co.

Petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, 182 S.E.2d 839.

Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamel v. Young Spring & Wire Corp., 183 S.E.2d 687, 279 N.C. 511, 1971 N.C. LEXIS 868 (N.C. 1971).

183 S.E.2d 687 (Hamel v. Young Spring & Wire Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hamel v. YOUNG SPRING & WIRE CORPORATION
182 S.E.2d 839 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1971)