Hamel v. Young Spring & Wire Corp.
This text of 183 S.E.2d 687 (Hamel v. Young Spring & Wire Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Reginald S. HAMEL, Ancillary Administrator of the Estate of William Thomas McDowell, Jr.
v.
YOUNG SPRING & WIRE CORP. et al.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Claude R. Dunbar, Hunter M. Jones, for plaintiff.
John H. Small, R. C. Carmichael, Jr., for defendants Young Spring & Wire Corp., Paul Handeman, Inc., and Daybrook-Ottawa Corp.
Carpenter, Golding, Crews & Meekins, Michael K. Gordon, for defendant Twin-States Truck Equipment Co.
Petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, 182 S.E.2d 839.
Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
183 S.E.2d 687, 279 N.C. 511, 1971 N.C. LEXIS 868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamel-v-young-spring-wire-corp-nc-1971.