Hamel v. State

45 S.W.2d 972, 119 Tex. Crim. 369, 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 90
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 27, 1932
DocketNo. 14811
StatusPublished

This text of 45 S.W.2d 972 (Hamel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hamel v. State, 45 S.W.2d 972, 119 Tex. Crim. 369, 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 90 (Tex. 1932).

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Unlawfully practicing medicine is the offense; penalty assessed at a fine of $250 and confinement in the county jail for thirty days.

The offense is denounced in articles 741-742, P. C., 1925.

The term of court at which the trial took place ended on the 30th day of May, 1931. The appeal was prosecuted during the term and bond filed on the 1st day of May, 1931. The.statute contemplates that when an appeal is taken during the term, jurisdiction of this court is acquired by a recognizance. See article 818, C. C. P., 1925; also King v. State, 83 Texas Crim. Rep., 304, 203 S. W., 52, and other cases collated in Vernon’s Ann. Tex. C. C. P., vol. 3, page 191. Under the present status of the case, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. It is therefore dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

King v. State
203 S.W. 52 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 S.W.2d 972, 119 Tex. Crim. 369, 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamel-v-state-texcrimapp-1932.