Hamel v. Rao
725 N.W.2d 26, 477 Mich. 976
This text of 725 N.W.2d 26 (Hamel v. Rao) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hamel v. Rao, 725 N.W.2d 26, 477 Mich. 976 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
Kevin HAMEL and Kathleen Hamel, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Sudhir B. RAO, M.D., and Big Rapids Orthopaedics, P.C., Defendants-Appellants, and
Mecosta County General Hospital, Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 31, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
725 N.W.2d 26, 477 Mich. 976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamel-v-rao-mich-2006.