Hamdi v. Rumsfeld

378 F.3d 426, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 16298, 2004 WL 1766733
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 6, 2004
DocketNo. 02-7338
StatusPublished

This text of 378 F.3d 426 (Hamdi v. Rumsfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 378 F.3d 426, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 16298, 2004 WL 1766733 (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

ORDER

WILKINS, Circuit Judge.

The United States Supreme Court has vacated the judgment and remanded this case. In obedience to the mandate of the Supreme Court we hereby remand the case to the Eastern District of Virginia for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision. In light of the Court’s holding in Rumsfeld v. Padilla, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2711, 159 L.Ed.2d 513 (2004), we note that any motion with respect to the issue of venue may be addressed to the district court.

Entered at the direction of Chief Judge Wilkins, with the concurrence of Judge Wilkinson and Judge Traxler.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rumsfeld v. Padilla
542 U.S. 426 (Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
378 F.3d 426, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 16298, 2004 WL 1766733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamdi-v-rumsfeld-ca4-2004.