Hamby v. State

83 S.W. 322, 72 Ark. 623, 1904 Ark. LEXIS 211
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedOctober 22, 1904
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 83 S.W. 322 (Hamby v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hamby v. State, 83 S.W. 322, 72 Ark. 623, 1904 Ark. LEXIS 211 (Ark. 1904).

Opinion

Wood, J.

The testimony of experts introduced on behalf of appellant tended to show that deceased’s death was not caused by the blows received at the hands of appellant, but was the result of opiate poison of some kind. The testimony on behalf of the State tended to show that deceased was killed by the blows of appellant. The question as to how deceased came to his death was fairly submitted to the jury upon the proper instructions, and the jury was fully warranted in its conclusion that appellant killed deceased. The uncontradicted proof on behalf of the State, and also the testimony of appellant himself, shows that the defendant was guilty of murder in the second degree. He received the lowest punishment for this offense, and therefore could not have been prejudiced by any of the rulings of which he here complains, even if they were erroneous.

Affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McKenzie Const. Co. v. City of San Antonio
50 S.W.2d 349 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Green v. State
121 S.W. 949 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1909)
Walker v. State
121 S.W. 925 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 S.W. 322, 72 Ark. 623, 1904 Ark. LEXIS 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamby-v-state-ark-1904.