Hamburger v. Lipschitz

111 N.Y.S. 696
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 30, 1908·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The court denied a motion for a new trial, made on the ground of newly discovered evidence. The motion was not made upon a case settled, as required by the rules of practice, and cannot, therefore, be reviewed by this court: Altmark v. Haimowitz, 55 Misc. Rep. 195, 105 N. Y. Supp. 205.

The appeal is dismissed, but, under the circumstances, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamburger v. Lipschitz, 111 N.Y.S. 696 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

111 N.Y.S. 696 (Hamburger v. Lipschitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Altmark v. Haimowitz
55 Misc. 195 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)