Hamburger v. Lipschitz
111 N.Y.S. 696
This text of 111 N.Y.S. 696 (Hamburger v. Lipschitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hamburger v. Lipschitz, 111 N.Y.S. 696 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).
Opinion
The court denied a motion for a new trial, made on the ground of newly discovered evidence. The motion was not made upon a case settled, as required by the rules of practice, and cannot, therefore, be reviewed by this court: Altmark v. Haimowitz, 55 Misc. Rep. 195, 105 N. Y. Supp. 205.
The appeal is dismissed, but, under the circumstances, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Altmark v. Haimowitz
55 Misc. 195 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
111 N.Y.S. 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamburger-v-lipschitz-nyappterm-1908.