Hamburger v. Hellman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Hamburger v. Hellman

90 N.Y.S. 1060

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedDecember 7, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 90 N.Y.S. 1060 (Hamburger v. Hellman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hamburger v. Hellman, 90 N.Y.S. 1060 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The summons in this action demands a judgment for $500 and interest. The pleadings are oral. Plaintiff’s bill of particulars sets forth claims aggregating $507.33. Under the decision of this court in Pierson v. Hughes, 88 N. Y. Supp. 1059, the Municipal Court has no jurisdiction in the action, and the judgment herein must be reversed, and the complaint dismissed, with costs, but, in order to settle this question, with leave to the respondent to appeal to the Appellate Division.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The summons in this action demands a judgment for $500 and interest. The pleadings are oral. Plaintiff’s bill of particulars sets forth claims aggregating $507.33. Under the decision of this court in Pierson v. Hughes, 88 N. Y. Supp. 1059, the Municipal Court has no jurisdiction in the action, and the judgment herein must be reversed, and the complaint dismissed, with costs, but, in order to settle this question, with leave to the respondent to appeal to the Appellate Division.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 N.Y.S. 1060, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamburger-v-hellman-nyappterm-1904.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack