Hamburger v. Hellman

90 N.Y.S. 1060
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided December 7, 1904·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The summons in this action demands a judgment for $500 and interest. The pleadings are oral. Plaintiff’s bill of particulars sets forth claims aggregating $507.33. Under the decision of this court in Pierson v. Hughes, 88 N. Y. Supp. 1059, the Municipal Court has no jurisdiction in the action, and the judgment herein must be reversed, and the complaint dismissed, with costs, but, in order to settle this question, with leave to the respondent to appeal to the Appellate Division.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamburger v. Hellman, 90 N.Y.S. 1060 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

90 N.Y.S. 1060 (Hamburger v. Hellman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pierson v. Hughes
88 N.Y.S. 1059 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904)