Hamburg-American Line Terminal & Navigation Co. v. United States
59 Ct. Cl. 461, 1924 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 518, 1924 WL 2393
Opinion
[462] MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT
1. The action sounds in tort. Hijo case, 194 U. S. 315; Herrera case, 222 U. S. 558.
2. The court is without jurisdiction. Cases supra. See also opinion in Deutsch-Australische, etc., case No. C-576, decided this day, ante, p. 450.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hamburg-American Line Terminal & Navigation Co. v. United States, 59 Ct. Cl. 461, 1924 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 518, 1924 WL 2393 (cc 1924).
59 Ct. Cl. 461 (Hamburg-American Line Terminal & Navigation Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
R. Ribas Y Hijo v. United States
194 U.S. 315 (Supreme Court, 1904)
Herrera v. United States
222 U.S. 558 (Supreme Court, 1911)