Hambright v. Southern Railway

82 S.E. 416, 98 S.C. 219, 1914 S.C. LEXIS 34
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided July 17, 1914·No. 8890·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Gary.

This is an appeal from an order allowing the plaintiff to amend the summons and complaint, by substituting' the name of “Atlanta and Charlotte Air Line Railway Company,” instead of the defendant, “Southern Railway—Carolina Division;” also from an order refusing- the motion, to allow the defendant h> tax costs against the plaintiff.

The order allowing- the amendment was, in effect, a dismissal of the complaint against the defendant, Southern Railway—Carolina Division, and was not prejudicial to its rights. Therefore the exception assigning error in this respect is overruled. But, as the order was, practically, a dismissal of the complaint, the defendant was entitled to its costs, and there was error in refusing to allow the defendant to tax them against the plaintiff.

Modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hambright v. Southern Railway, 82 S.E. 416, 98 S.C. 219, 1914 S.C. LEXIS 34 (S.C. 1914).

82 S.E. 416 (Hambright v. Southern Railway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.