Hamblin v. Chinn

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Hamblin v. Chinn

307 S.W.2d 556

DecidedNovember 22, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 307 S.W.2d 556 (Hamblin v. Chinn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hamblin v. Chinn, 307 S.W.2d 556 (Ky. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from a judgment of the Whitley Circuit Court, Honorable W. L. Rose, Judge, dismissing appellants’ [557]*557complaint seeking cancellation of a written contract. The amount in controversy is less than $2,500.

The sole issue in the case was whether the appellant, Bill Hamblin, had the mental capacity to execute the contract in question. The Circuit Judge found that Bill Hamblin possessed mental capacity to make the agreement, and entered a judgment accordingly. After a careful review of the case, we cannot say that the findings of facts of the trial court are clearly erroneous. CR 52.01. See, Clay, CR 52.01, Author’s Comment, No. 6.

The motion for an appeal is overruled, and the judgment stands affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from a judgment of the Whitley Circuit Court, Honorable W. L. Rose, Judge, dismissing appellants’ [557]*557complaint seeking cancellation of a written contract. The amount in controversy is less than $2,500.

The sole issue in the case was whether the appellant, Bill Hamblin, had the mental capacity to execute the contract in question. The Circuit Judge found that Bill Hamblin possessed mental capacity to make the agreement, and entered a judgment accordingly. After a careful review of the case, we cannot say that the findings of facts of the trial court are clearly erroneous. CR 52.01. See, Clay, CR 52.01, Author’s Comment, No. 6.

The motion for an appeal is overruled, and the judgment stands affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

307 S.W.2d 556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamblin-v-chinn-kyctapp-1957.