Hamblin Real Estate Co. v. City of Astoria

40 P. 230, 26 Or. 599, 1894 Ore. LEXIS 131
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided July 23, 1894·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The facts in this case are the same as in the case of Welch v. City of Astoria, ante, p. 89, 37 Pac. [600]*60066, decided July fifth, eighteen hundred and ninety-four, with the exception that the complaint not only contains an allegation of tender, but also that it was kept good by bringing and depositing the amount thereof in court for the defendant, and hence within the principle announced in the Welch case, the complaint states a cause of suit. The decree must therefore be reversed and the cause remanded for. trial. Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamblin Real Estate Co. v. City of Astoria, 40 P. 230, 26 Or. 599, 1894 Ore. LEXIS 131 (Or. 1894).

40 P. 230 (Hamblin Real Estate Co. v. City of Astoria) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Southern Pac. Co. v. Siemens
150 P. 290 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1915)