Hambleton v. Lynch

32 Mo. 259
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedMarch 15, 1862
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 32 Mo. 259 (Hambleton v. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hambleton v. Lynch, 32 Mo. 259 (Mo. 1862).

Opinion

Bates, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Hambleton sued Lynch for possession of a slave. The slave had been seized in execution against a third person by constable Watson, who deposited him with Lynch, who was keeper of a negro yard, merely for safe keeping.

After the seizure of the slave by the constable, he was claimed by the plaintiff Hambleton, and thereupon the plaintiff in the executions gave indemnification bonds, as provided by the statute, and required the constable to sell the slave. Before sale, the slave was taken from the possession of Lynch by the proceedings in this case. At the trial, judgment was given for the defendant. The judgment was right. The possession of Lynch was the possessioxx of the constable only, and the suit could not be maintained against the constable. (State to the use of Goldsall v. Watson, 30 Mo. 122; St. Louis, Alton and Chicago Railroad v. Castello, id. 124.)

Judgment affirmed.

Judges Bay and Dryden concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Studebaker Bros. Manufacturing Co. v. Davis
119 S.W. 532 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1909)
Rosentreter v. Brady
63 Mo. App. 398 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1895)
Goldsmith v. Taussig
60 Mo. App. 460 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 Mo. 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hambleton-v-lynch-mo-1862.