Hamane v. Elofir
This text of Hamane v. Elofir (Hamane v. Elofir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
WAFA HAMANE,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D16-4211
ABDERRAZAK ELOFIR,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed August 18, 2017
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Dan Traver, Judge.
Jeffrey A. Conner, Winter Garden, for Appellant.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, the former wife, seeks review of an order granting a motion filed by
Appellee, the former husband, to dissolve a permanent injunction against domestic
violence. Appellee failed to present any evidence at the evidentiary hearing
"demonstrat[ing] that the scenario underlying the injunction no longer exists so that
continuation of the injunction would serve no valid purpose." Alkhoury v. Alkhoury, 54
So. 3d 641, 642 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). Here, as in Alkhoury, Appellee failed to offer any changed circumstance relevant to the specific facts underlying the injunction he sought
to dissolve. Accordingly, we reverse and remand with instructions that the injunction
against domestic violence be reinstated.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
SAWAYA, LAMBERT and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hamane v. Elofir, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamane-v-elofir-fladistctapp-2017.