Hamaker v. Highline Med. Ctr.

Washington Supreme Court

Hamaker v. Highline Med. Ctr.

447 P.3d 155, 193 Wash. 2d 1034

Washington Supreme Court·Decided September 4, 2019·No. No. 97228-1·Published

Opinion

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its September 3, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review is denied.

For the Court.

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its September 3, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review is denied.

For the Court.

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Hamaker v. Highline Med. Ctr., 447 P.3d 155, 193 Wash. 2d 1034 (Wash. 2019).

Pincite

447 P.3d 155 (Hamaker v. Highline Med. Ctr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.