Ham v. State

259 So. 2d 190, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 7076
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 16, 1972·No. No. Q-115·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed. See McCutchen v. State, 96 So.2d 152 (Fla.1957).

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ham v. State, 259 So. 2d 190, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 7076 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

259 So. 2d 190 (Ham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ham v. State
301 So. 2d 467 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)