Ham v. State

17 Ala. 188
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided January 15, 1850·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

CHILTON, J.

The decision of this court in Williams v. The State, found reported in 15 Ala. Rep. 259-263, is an authority directly in point to show that the judgment of conviction in this case cannot be supported. It is there said'that the indictment should substantially and with particularity allege the existence of such a state of facts as constitutes the offence denounced by the statute, and that although the proof of these facts might constitute a larceny at the common law, it is not sufficient for the indictment to charge the offence in the general terms sanctioned by precedent.

Let the cause be reversed and remanded, and the prisoner be retained in custody to await a further trial, or until otherwise discharged by due course of law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ham v. State, 17 Ala. 188 (Ala. 1850).

17 Ala. 188 (Ham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

La Vaul v. State
40 Ala. 44 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1866)
Alsey v. State
39 Ala. 664 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1866)
Barber v. State
34 Ala. 213 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1859)
Henry v. State
33 Ala. 389 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1859)
Spencer v. State
20 Ala. 24 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1852)
Ewing v. Sanford
19 Ala. 605 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1851)
Murray v. State
18 Ala. 727 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1851)