Ham v. Kendall

111 Mass. 297
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 15, 1873·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

When the ice-house was erected upon the land under the agreement, it was personal property. The sales, whether of the land or the building, did not change its character in this respect. No notice to remove it was given to its owner, and he had a right to go upon the land and remove it, and appropriate the materials to his own use.

Judgment for the defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ham v. Kendall, 111 Mass. 297 (Mass. 1873).

111 Mass. 297 (Ham v. Kendall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Batcheller v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.
10 N.E. 321 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1887)
Rogers v. Cox
96 Ind. 157 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1884)
Little v. Willford
17 N.W. 282 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1883)
Pope v. Skinkle
45 N.J.L. 39 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1883)
Griffin v. Ransdell
71 Ind. 440 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1880)
Hartwell v. Kelly
117 Mass. 235 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1875)