Ham v. Kendall
111 Mass. 297
This text of 111 Mass. 297 (Ham v. Kendall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ham v. Kendall, 111 Mass. 297 (Mass. 1873).
Opinion
When the ice-house was erected upon the land under the agreement, it was personal property. The sales, whether of the land or the building, did not change its character in this respect. No notice to remove it was given to its owner, and he had a right to go upon the land and remove it, and appropriate the materials to his own use.
Judgment for the defendants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Batcheller v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.
10 N.E. 321 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1887)
Rogers v. Cox
96 Ind. 157 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1884)
Little v. Willford
17 N.W. 282 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1883)
Pope v. Skinkle
45 N.J.L. 39 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1883)
Griffin v. Ransdell
71 Ind. 440 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1880)
Hartwell v. Kelly
117 Mass. 235 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1875)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
111 Mass. 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ham-v-kendall-mass-1873.