Halyburton v. . Carson

80 N.C. 16
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 5, 1879·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Ashe, J.

The only question presented for the consideration and decision of this court in this voluminous record of' seventy-two pages is, whether a judge of a superior court has the power to vacate a judgment rendered by him during the same term.

It is familiar learning that all the proceedings of a court of record are in fieri — under the absolute control of the-judge, subject to be amended, modified or annulled at any time before the expiration of the term in which they are had or done.

Faircloth v. Isler, 76 N. C. 49; Dick v. Dickson, 63 N. C. 488; Sneed v. Leigh, 3 Dev. 364; Coke upon Littleton 1st Am. Ed. 260 (a.)

No error. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Halyburton v. . Carson, 80 N.C. 16 (N.C. 1879).

80 N.C. 16 (Halyburton v. . Carson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cook v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
64 S.E. 204 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1909)
State v. Schenck.
49 S.E. 917 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1905)