Halyburton v. . Carson

80 N.C. 16
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 5, 1879
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 80 N.C. 16 (Halyburton v. . Carson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Halyburton v. . Carson, 80 N.C. 16 (N.C. 1879).

Opinion

Ashe, J.

The only question presented for the consideration and decision of this court in this voluminous record of' seventy-two pages is, whether a judge of a superior court has the power to vacate a judgment rendered by him during the same term.

It is familiar learning that all the proceedings of a court of record are in fieri — under the absolute control of the-judge, subject to be amended, modified or annulled at any time before the expiration of the term in which they are had or done.

Faircloth v. Isler, 76 N. C. 49; Dick v. Dickson, 63 N. C. 488; Sneed v. Leigh, 3 Dev. 364; Coke upon Littleton 1st Am. Ed. 260 (a.)

No error. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cook v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
64 S.E. 204 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1909)
State v. Schenck.
49 S.E. 917 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 N.C. 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halyburton-v-carson-nc-1879.